Do you agree with his statement? Why or why not?
Personally, I disagree with his statement. In my family I have 3 older brothers who, at some point in their life, have played a video game that involved guns. Although they use real weapons, I feel that its purpose is not to create more violence in the world by providing how to cause death with a real life weapon. It's simply a way to make the gaming experience more realistic so that the gamer doesn't lose interest, and also to keep them coming back for the newest products they produce. There is also an army gaming center that encourages kids to come play the games and then hopefully in the future become interested in serving for our country. If placing real guns into games was a bad idea I feel that the army would not use games to reach out to kids because they wouldn't want to send out the wrong message.
In the case of "the Army Experience" do you agree with their techniques to reaching out to the youth?
No comments:
Post a Comment